ISLAMABAD: Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on Monday the government had the votes required to pass the 27th constitutional amendment, as Pakistan’s Senate resumed debate on legislation that would overhaul key aspects of the judicial structure, military command arrangements and federal-provincial revenue balance.
The draft amendment tabled last week introduces several far-reaching changes. It rewrites Article 243 of the Constitution to create the new post of Chief of Defense Forces, abolishing the long-standing role of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee (CJCSC). The army chief would be elevated to the constitutionally recognized top command of Pakistan’s armed services, while the president would formally appoint the army, navy and air chiefs on the prime minister’s advice. The amendment also proposes establishing a constitutional court, revising procedures on the transfer of judges and altering the framework that governs how federal revenue is shared with provinces.
The proposed changes to the National Finance Commission (NFC) award, which governs how federal tax revenues are divided among provinces, are particularly sensitive because they underpin Pakistan’s federal structure and provincial fiscal autonomy.
“God willing, we have the complete votes [to have the amendment passed],” Tarar told reporters at the Parliament House. “There is no ambiguity in it. This is a positive constitutional amendment and has been made keeping in mind the best international practices in the world and our prevailing circumstances.”
Constitutional amendments in Pakistan require a two-thirds majority in both houses of parliament. Since its adoption in 1973, the constitution has been amended more than two dozen times, often reflecting shifts in authority between civilian governments, the judiciary and the military.
The current proposal follows the 26th constitutional amendment passed in October 2024, which gave parliament a formal role in appointing the chief justice and established a senior judges’ panel to hear constitutional cases, measures critics said weakened judicial independence.
Opposition lawmakers have warned the 27th amendment would undermine civilian oversight and provincial rights. Ruling party members have rejected this, arguing the changes clarify institutional roles and strengthen the federation.
Both the Senate and the National Assembly are continuing debate this week as the government works to secure the required majority.
